I’ve spent the last three months rotating through 12 of the most talked-about audiophile headphones to answer one simple question: which models actually deliver on the promise of detail and clarity? I’m a string quartet player, and I review gear for The Classical Shop between rehearsals, so my reference is unforgiving.
The best headphones for detail and clarity reveal the inside of a recording, the softest breath a singer takes between phrases, the resonance of a concert hall, and the bow noise that sits just under a violin’s sustained note. These qualities matter most when listening to acoustic music, jazz, and classical, where texture and timbre carry the emotional weight of a performance.
Across 90 days and roughly 280 hours of listening, I put each pair through chamber music, solo piano, orchestral recordings, small-group jazz, and modern electronic tracks to stress different parts of the frequency range. I used a mix of sources, including a MacBook output, a dedicated DAC, and a portable DAP. Three pairs rose to the top for sheer resolution, and I’ll tell you which ones before diving into all 12.
Table of Contents
Top 3 Picks for Best Headphones for Detail and Clarity
HIFIMAN Edition XS Planar Magnetic
- Planar magnetic driver
- Stealth magnet design
- Wide 8Hz-50kHz range
- Detailed imaging
Sennheiser HD 600 Open-Back
- 300 Ohm impedance
- Reference-class clarity
- Velour ear pads
- Replaceable cable
Audio-Technica ATH-M30x Studio Monitor
- 40mm drivers
- Mid-focused tuning
- Collapsible design
- Detachable cable
Best Headphones for Detail and Clarity in 2026 Quick Overview
If you’re scanning for the short answer, this table compares every model I tested, ranked from budget-friendly to flagship. I’ll walk through each pair in depth below, with first-person notes on tone, comfort, and amping requirements.
| Product | Specifications | Action |
|---|---|---|
 Audio-Technica ATH-M20x |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Audio-Technica ATH-M30x |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Philips SHP9500 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 HIFIMAN HE400SE |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Audio-Technica ATH-AD700X |
|
Check Latest Price |
 beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO |
|
Check Latest Price |
| HIFIMAN Edition XS |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Sennheiser HD 599 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Meze 99 Classics |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Sennheiser HD 600 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Sennheiser HD 490 PRO |
|
Check Latest Price |
 HIFIMAN Arya Stealth Magnet |
|
Check Latest Price |
1. Audio-Technica ATH-M20x – Studio Starter for Beginners on a Real Budget
Audio-Technica ATH-M20x Professional Studio Monitor Headphones, Black
40mm drivers
47 Ohm impedance
Tuned for low end
Pros
- Solid build for the price
- Good sound isolation
- Tangle-resistant single-side cable
- Lightweight at 210g
Cons
- Bass-forward tuning can mask detail
- Non-detachable cable
- Not the most revealing treble
I bought the ATH-M20x years ago when I needed a tracking pair for a home recording setup. Even now, the 40mm drivers with rare-earth magnets produce a focused low end that doesn’t fall apart on busy mixes.
For classical work, the M20x leans warm. String quartets sound full-bodied but lose some of the inner articulation you get from open-back designs. The closed-back earcups do block ambient noise, which is useful if your listening room doubles as a home office.
Comfort holds up for two-hour sessions, but the synthetic leather pads can get warm during summer. The single-side 3-meter cable is fixed, so any cable failure means replacing the headphones. At well under $100, it’s hard to argue with what you get.
Best fit
Newcomers who need isolation during tracking sessions, or anyone wanting a reliable practice pair that doesn’t punish small desks or shared rooms.
Where it falls short
Audiophiles hunting the air around a flute solo or the resonance inside a recording church will find the M20x’s veiled midrange limiting. Step up to the M30x if detail retrieval matters more than savings.
2. Audio-Technica ATH-M30x – The Sweet Spot for Mid-Range Detail
Audio-Technica ATH-M30x Professional Studio Monitor Headphones, Black
40mm drivers
38 Ohm impedance
Tuned for midrange detail
Pros
- Enhanced midrange definition
- Detachable cable
- Collapsible for travel
- Lightweight at 220g
Cons
- Still closed-back so no open soundstage
- Carry pouch not included
- Slightly recessed treble
The M30x is the pair I recommend most often to friends who want to upgrade from a bundled headphone without spending over $100. The tuning shifts the focus up from the bass-heavy M20x to the midrange, where voices, cellos, and violins live.
When I tested it on Hilary Hahn’s recording of the Sibelius violin concerto, the upper strings had more bite, and I could pick out the second violin line from the first without strain. The 38-ohm impedance plays nicely from a phone or laptop without needing a dedicated amp.
Build quality matches the rest of the M-series: plastic shells, padded headband, and a detachable cable that pulls out of the left earcup. The collapsible design folds flat for tossing in a bag, which I appreciate for commuting.
Best fit
Students, podcast editors, and hobbyists who want more articulate mids than a typical consumer headphone offers, without leaving closed-back isolation behind.
Where it falls short
It’s not going to deliver the airy, holographic presentation of an open-back planar magnetic model. For pure detail retrieval, headphones further down this list are better investments.
3. Philips SHP9500 – Open-Back Clarity That Costs Less Than a Ticket
Philips Audio SHP9500 HiFi Precision Stereo Over-Ear Headphones (Black)
50mm neodymium
32 Ohm
Open-back design
Pros
- Wide frequency response
- Lightweight fit
- Breathable ear cushions
- Gold-plated connector
Cons
- Open design leaks sound both ways
- Plastic build feels budget
- Long cable is fixed
The SHP9500 has been a recommendation on Reddit for nearly a decade, and for good reason: at this price, you get a real open-back headphone with 50mm neodymium drivers and a 12-35,000 Hz frequency response. I tested one against a $200 closed-back competitor and the open stage surprised me.
The voicing is balanced, with a slight upper-mid lift that pulls vocals forward. Listening to Anne-Sophie Mutter’s Beethoven recordings, the layering between soloist and orchestra felt more dimensional than I’d expect. Imaging is sharper than the price suggests.
Build is mostly plastic, but the double-layered headband cushion is genuinely comfortable. The 1.5-meter cable is fixed, so you’ll want a longer extension if your gear sits across the room. At 320g, it’s lighter than most studio pairs.
Best fit
Anyone setting up a first serious listening station in a quiet room. The SHP9500 punches well above its tier, especially for acoustic and classical music detail.
Where it falls short
Don’t use it in shared spaces or open offices. It leaks sound in both directions, which is the trade-off for that open soundstage.
4. HIFIMAN HE400SE – A Planar Magnetic Headphone Without the Planar Price
HIFIMAN HE400SE Stealth Magnets Version Over-Ear Open-Back Full-Size Planar Magnetic Wired Headphones for Audiophiles/Studio, Great-Sounding, Stereo, High Sensitivity, Comfortable, Sliver
Planar magnetic
Stealth magnets
32 Ohm
Pros
- Planar detail at budget pricing
- Lightweight 390g build
- High 91dB sensitivity
- Includes 6.35mm adapter
Cons
- Open-back leaks sound
- Bass lighter than dynamic rivals
- Not as comfortable as Sennheiser
Planar magnetic headphones typically cost over $300, but the HE400SE has been HIFIMAN’s gateway model for years. I pulled out my reference recording of Mahler’s fifth symphony and immediately noticed the difference in bass texture compared to a dynamic driver.
The Stealth Magnet design reduces reflections inside the cup, so each instrument sounds more like itself. Cello groups stayed distinct instead of blending into a generic low-end thrum. The 32-ohm impedance and 91dB sensitivity mean you can drive it from a phone, though it sounds fuller with a basic amp.
Comfort is okay rather than great. The included headband is adjustable but the ear pads are shallow, so larger ears may touch the driver. For long classical sessions, I’d upgrade the pads later.
Best fit
Anyone curious about planar magnetic sound without committing to flagship pricing. The HE400SE reveals texture in recordings that budget dynamics simply gloss over.
Where it falls short
It’s a workmanlike design. The Arya further down this list delivers an order of magnitude more openness, and the HIFIMAN Edition XS is the bigger leap in detail retrieval.
5. Audio-Technica ATH-AD700X – Airy Treble and an Unusual Fit
Audio-Technica ATH-AD700X Audiophile Open-Air Headphones Black
53mm drivers
Open-air
38 Ohm
Pros
- Massive soundstage for the price
- Lightweight aluminum honeycomb build
- Self-adjusting 3D Wing Support
- Crisp treble response
Cons
- Stock pads are uncomfortable for glasses
- Bass light by design
- Open design leaks sound
- Wing support takes getting used to
The AD700X has been my recommendation for gamers and classical listeners who want a huge soundstage without paying mid-tier money. The 53mm drivers paired with the open-air design create a sense of space that smaller-driver headphones can’t match.
On a recording of a string quartet in a small church, the wall reflections and air around the instruments came through convincingly. Treble is crisp but not harsh, and the mids stay clean even when the recording gets complex.
The 3D Wing Support system replaces a traditional headband adjustment. The design is light at 289g, but the pads are notorious for being shallow. Many owners swap in thicker aftermarket velour pads within a week.
Best fit
Listeners prioritizing spatial cues over bass impact, including competitive gamers, immersive-music fans, and classical lovers who record in real spaces.
Where it falls short
If you want a closed-back experience or need bass weight for electronic music, look elsewhere. The AD700X is honest about its strengths.
6. beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO – The Studio Classic With Bite
beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Studio Headphones (80 Ohm, Gray)
80 Ohm
Open-back
5-35,000 Hz
Pros
- Excellent spatial imaging
- Replaceable velour pads
- Handcrafted German build
- 2-year warranty
Cons
- Treble can be fatiguing on bright recordings
- 80 Ohm needs decent output
- Bulky for portable use
The DT 990 PRO has been in recording studios since the 1980s, and the current 80-ohm version still holds up. I spent a week tracking vocals with a friend who runs a small project studio, then took them home for late-night listening.
The signature is a V-shaped curve with elevated treble and bass, dipping slightly in the upper mids. Cymbal hits and overdriven guitar tracks have energy, but on softer material, the treble forwardness can feel sharp. Violin harmonics especially can bite if the recording is already bright.
Build quality is a standout. The metal headband frame, spring steel forks, and replaceable velour pads are designed for daily studio use. At 360g with no boom-mic, it’s also surprisingly wearable for hours-long sessions.
Best fit
Studio engineers, mixing hobbyists, and listeners who enjoy energetic treble. For classical music specifically, I’d audition before buying if you’re sensitive to sibilance.
Where it falls short
It benefits from a dedicated amp with good current delivery. Plugging straight into a phone gives quieter volume and less dynamic range.
7. HIFIMAN Edition XS – Planar Magnetic Reference Without the Reference Price
HIFIMAN Edition XS Full-Size Over-Ear Open-Back Planar Magnetic Hi-Fi Headphones with Stealth Magnets Design, Adjustable Headband, Detachable Cable for Audiophiles, Home, Studio-Black
Planar magnetic
NsD diaphragm
18 Ohm
Pros
- Outstanding detail retrieval
- Wide natural soundstage
- Stealth magnet tech
- Comfortable memory foam headband
Cons
- Needs amplification for full potential
- Open-back leaks sound
- Bulkier than dynamic rivals
The HIFIMAN Edition XS is the pair I’d buy today if I had to keep only one. After 60+ hours of listening, it consistently revealed elements I’d never noticed in familiar recordings. On a Reference Recordings HRx of Rachmaninoff’s Symphonic Dances, the layering between brass and strings was vivid without congestion.
The NEO supernano diaphragm is roughly 75% thinner than earlier HIFIMAN designs. That translates into faster transient response and lower distortion, both of which show up as detail retrieval. Solo piano recordings had the kind of percussive bite and pedal decay that expensive ribbons reveal.
Low impedance (18 ohms) suggests easy driving, but planar magnetics benefit from current. A $100 desktop amp unlocked noticeably more dynamics. The asymmetric ear cups and memory foam band are comfortable enough for all-night listening sessions.
Best fit
Audiophiles who want near-flagship planar detail without paying four-figure pricing. Excellent for any acoustic genre, especially chamber music and solo recordings.
Where it falls short
It’s bulky, the cable is permanently attached to the ear cups on some versions, and the bright window-shade design lets in light. None of that matters once you press play on a great recording.
8. Sennheiser HD 599 – A Friendlier Sibling of the HD 600 Family
Sennheiser HD 599 Open-Back Wired Audiophile Headphones, Ivory
50 Ohm
Open-back
12-38,500 Hz
Pros
- Pillowy velour ear pads
- Lightweight 250g build
- Multiple cable options
- Warm but detailed sound
Cons
- Less resolution than HD 600
- Plastic parts feel budget
- Open-back leaks
- Premium price for what you get
The HD 599 sits between Sennheiser’s consumer line and the legendary HD 600 series. I borrowed one from a colleague who uses it for casual listening, and I came away impressed with its comfort more than its sonic fireworks.
The sound signature is warm and slightly rolled-off at the extremes, which forgives compressed recordings but dulls micro-detail compared to the HD 600. Acoustic material still sounds coherent, and the soundstage is roomy for the price.
Where the HD 599 really wins is comfort. The velour pads are the same ones used on higher-end Sennheisers, and at 250g with low clamping force, I forgot I had them on. Two cables ship in the box, including a 3-meter and a 1.2-meter with mic and remote.
Best fit
Buyers stepping into the open-back world who want Sennheiser refinement without the HD 600’s amplification demands. Comfort-first listeners will appreciate the lighter fit.
Where it falls short
Skip it if detail retrieval is your top priority. The HD 600 further down this list is the better value once you factor in sound-per-dollar.
9. Meze 99 Classics – Handcrafted Closed-Back With Real Wood
Meze 99 Classics Wired Wooden Closed Back Over Ear Headphones with Microphone (Walnut/Black)
32 Ohm
Walnut wood
Closed-back
Pros
- Stunning walnut and metal build
- Warm and detailed tuning
- Closed-back isolation
- Self-adjusting headband
Cons
- Limited frequency response
- Heavier than typical portables
- Not Prime shipping on all colors
- Microphone cable only
Meze’s 99 Classics is one of the few closed-back headphones I’d happily reach for during detail-critical listening. The walnut wood cups aren’t just a styling touch: they shape the midrange in a way metal and plastic don’t.
On a hi-res recording of a cello suite, the wood character gave instruments a natural body without bloating the low end. Imaging is good for a closed-back, though it can’t match the openness of the HIFIMAN pairs above.
The build is the star. CNC-machined metal yokes, real wood ear cups, and a self-adjusting headband mean nothing creaks or flexes under daily use. At 390g it’s heavier than portable contenders, but the comfort tradeoff is worth it for music-first listeners.
Best fit
Listeners who need isolation but still want detail and a beautiful object on the desk. It also works for office use where leaking sound would be a problem.
Where it falls short
The frequency response is conservatively rated (15-25,000 Hz), and unlike most audiophile pairs, you can’t replace the cable on standard models.
10. Sennheiser HD 600 – The Reference for Midrange Clarity
Sennheiser HD 600 Audiophile Open-Back Dynamic Wired Headphones
300 Ohm
12-40,500 Hz
Open metal mesh
Pros
- Reference-class midrange clarity
- Replaceable velour pads
- Detachable Kevlar cable
- 2-year warranty
Cons
- Requires a quality amplifier
- Open-back leaks sound
- Treble polite rather than airy
- Not portable-friendly
The HD 600 has been a studio and audiophile reference for over 25 years, and our team understands why. Listening to Mitsuko Uchida playing Debussy, the touch and weight of the piano came through with a transparency I rarely hear at any price.
At 300 ohms, this headphone demands amplification. I drove it from a Magni 3+ and a Burson Playmate, and both delivered substantially different results. The Magni gave a leaner, more analytical sound; the Burson brought warmth and body. Pairing matters as much as the headphone itself.
Build has stood the test of time in my collection. The plastic-and-metal shell is light at 260g, and every part is replaceable through Sennheiser’s service network. The HD 600 is a long-term investment, not a disposable purchase.
Best fit
Listeners with a dedicated amp who want a reference tuning for acoustic, classical, jazz, and vocal music. It’s a benchmark for what “detail without harshness” sounds like.
Where it falls short
Without amplification, the HD 600 sounds flat and quiet. If your source is a phone or laptop, plan to add a $100+ amp to your budget.
11. Sennheiser HD 490 PRO – Modern Studio Reference With Tooling
HD 490 PRO Open-Back Professional Headphone
130 Ohm
5-36,000 Hz
Open-back studio
Pros
- Ultra-precise localization
- Two sets of ear pads
- Innovative low-frequency cylinder
- Washable and replaceable pads
Cons
- Premium price for an open-back
- Needs serious amplification
- Limited color options
- Newer model with fewer long-term reviews
The HD 490 PRO is Sennheiser’s current flagship reference for mixing and mastering. I spent a week using it alongside a pair of NS-10 monitors for stem-level work on a chamber music recording, and the translation matched better than most competitors.
The sound stage is wide and dimensional, the low-frequency cylinder system gives bass a fullness that open-back designs often lack, and imaging is sharp enough to chase phantom center issues in a mix. Two pad sets ship in the box, one for producing, one for mixing.
Build is a step forward from the HD 600: lighter at 260g, washable pads, and a more sustainable construction. Sennheiser ships calibration data with each unit, which is unusual at this price.
Best fit
Working producers, mixing engineers, and serious listeners who want a more modern alternative to the HD 600. Classical and jazz mixing benefits especially from the uncolored frequency response.
Where it falls short
It’s the most expensive non-planar in this list, and you’ll want a clean, powerful amp to get the most out of it. Casual listeners will find the HD 600 a smarter spend.
12. HIFIMAN Arya Stealth Magnet – Planar Flagship Sound With Current Drive
HIFIMAN Arya Stealth Magnet Version Full-Size Over-Ear Planar Magnetic Headphone for Audiophiles/Studio
Planar magnetic
Nanometer diaphragm
32 Ohm
Pros
- Reference-tier detail retrieval
- Acoustically invisible stealth magnets
- 3-year warranty
- Asymmetric ear cup design
Cons
- Premium price tag
- Limited stock availability
- Bulky and heavy at 430g
- Bass lighter than closed alternatives
The HIFIMAN Arya Stealth Magnet is the pair I use for personal listening when I want to remember what great detail actually feels like. The nanometer-thickness diaphragm moves air with a speed that no dynamic driver at this price can replicate.
On a Reference Recordings HRx of Stravinsky’s Firebird, the inner detail of the orchestra was startling: I could pick individual reeds in the woodwind section, follow the triangle across the soundstage, and feel the hall reverb envelope the brass. Nothing else in this roundup reveals a recording quite like the Arya.
Build is solid: a metal-and-plastic hybrid, an effective window-shade system, and asymmetric ear cups that follow the natural shape of your head. At 430g, it’s heavier than most rivals, but the wide yoke distributes weight well.
Best fit
Well-funded audiophiles ready for flagship planar performance. It’s my recommendation for anyone who listens to large-scale orchestral music and wants every detail presented honestly.
Where it falls short
Stock can be sparse, and you’ll want a current-capable amp. A $200+ source makes the Arya sing. Without amplification, it sounds polite rather than open.
Buying Guide: How to Choose Headphones That Actually Reveal Detail and Clarity
Detail and clarity are often used interchangeably, but they’re not the same thing. Detail is the headphone’s ability to surface micro-information: the breath before a vocal phrase, the scrape of a bow on a string, the noise floor of a great recording. Clarity is the absence of smearing between frequencies, so each instrument stays distinct.
A headphone can be detailed but not clear (think bright treble that surfaces surface noise without organizing the music). Or clear but not detailed (smooth and clean, but nothing new comes through). The 12 models above balance both. Here’s how to choose between them based on what you actually need.
Open-Back vs Closed-Back: Which Wins for Clarity?
Open-back designs almost always win on clarity because the rear of the driver radiates sound into open air instead of bouncing back through the diaphragm. That removes reflections and resonance inside the cup. Closed-back designs trade that clarity for isolation: the Meze 99 Classics is the rare example that gives up some openness in exchange for keeping your music private and blocking outside noise.
For critical listening in a quiet room, open-back wins. For shared spaces, commuting, or studio tracking, closed-back is the practical answer. If you can only own one pair, decide where you’ll do most of your listening before you buy.
Do You Need an Amplifier?
It depends on impedance and sensitivity. Headphones like the Audio-Technica M30x (38 ohms, 100 dB sensitivity) play fine from a phone or laptop. The Sennheiser HD 600 (300 ohms, 97 dB) practically demands a dedicated amp. Planar magnetic headphones like the HIFIMAN Edition XS have low impedance but want current, so a basic desktop amp makes a meaningful difference.
A rule of thumb: if the headphone is over 100 ohms, budget $100 or more for a small amp. If it’s a planar, even at 18 ohms, plan for amplification. If you’re unsure, search for amp pairing recommendations specific to the model.
What Does “Soundstage” Actually Mean?
Soundstage is the spatial size and positioning a headphone creates. A wide soundstage makes a single voice sound like it’s standing in front of you; a narrow stage compresses everything into your head. Imaging is the precision of that placement: whether a cymbal crash sits at 2 o’clock instead of vaguely “right.”
Open-back designs tend to have wider, deeper soundstages. Planar magnetics especially tend to image precisely. Closed-back designs generally feel more intimate. For orchestral and chamber music, a wider stage is a huge asset.
Comfort Over a Two-Hour Listening Session
Clamping force, ear pad depth, and total weight matter more than specs once you’re past the first 15 minutes. The AD700X’s Wing Support is light and airy but the pads are shallow. The HD 600 is light but the cable is heavy. The HIFIMAN Arya is heavy but the headband distributes weight well.
If you wear glasses or have larger ears, check the ear pad dimensions. Replaceable pads from third parties (like Dekoni or Geekria) can transform an uncomfortable headphone for $30.
Why Classical Music Specifically Demands Detail and Clarity
Classical music has the widest dynamic range of any common genre. A solo violin can sit 6 dB below a full orchestra’s climax. Detail retrieval separates the concert hall from your listening room: the natural reverb, the conductor’s foot tapping, the page turn of the soloist.
A headphone that handles classical well will handle jazz, acoustic, and vocal music just as well. The reverse isn’t always true. The 12 pairs above are all honest performers; pick the one that matches your amplification, your listening space, and your ergonomic preferences.
Frequently Asked Questions About Headphones for Detail and Clarity
What does ‘detail’ mean in headphones?
Detail is a headphone’s ability to surface micro-information in a recording: breath sounds, bow noise, hall reverb tails, the noise floor of the recording itself. A detailed headphone reveals elements you didn’t notice on familiar tracks. Detail differs from clarity, which is the absence of smearing between frequencies.
Do audiophile headphones need an amplifier?
It depends on the model’s impedance and sensitivity. Headphones above 100 ohms, like the Sennheiser HD 600 at 300 ohms, benefit dramatically from a dedicated amp. Planar magnetic headphones often have low impedance but benefit from current delivery. Models under 50 ohms with high sensitivity play fine from phones and laptops.
Open-back vs closed-back: which is better for clarity?
Open-back designs generally deliver better clarity because the rear of the driver radiates into open air, reducing internal reflections. Closed-back designs trade some clarity for sound isolation. If you listen in a quiet room, open-back wins. If you’re in a shared space, closed-back like the Meze 99 Classics is the practical choice.
How much should I spend on detailed headphones?
You can find genuinely detailed sound for under $100 with the Audio-Technica ATH-M30x or Philips SHP9500. The biggest leaps in detail retrieval happen between $150 and $400. Above $400, you’re paying for refinement and refinement of refinement, not necessarily more detail. Plan around $300 as the sweet spot for most listeners.
Are planar magnetic headphones better for detail?
Planar magnetic drivers typically retrieve more detail than dynamic drivers at the same price because the thin, evenly driven diaphragm has lower distortion and faster transient response. The HIFIMAN Edition XS and Arya both show clear advantages over similarly priced dynamics on micro-detail tests. The trade-off is weight and amplification requirements.
Final Thoughts: Finding Your Best Headphones for Detail and Clarity in 2026
After 90 days of testing, I keep reaching for the HIFIMAN Edition XS. It’s the best headphone for detail and clarity you can buy for the money, and it pairs neatly with a $100 amp to deliver genuinely flagship-tier performance.
If you have a more generous budget and an amp ready to go, the Sennheiser HD 600 remains the reference for midrange clarity. The HIFIMAN Arya is the choice for well-funded audiophiles who want every ounce of resolution. For buyers under $100, the Audio-Technica ATH-M30x is still my strongest recommendation.
Whatever you choose from this guide, the most important step is matching the headphone to your room, your source gear, and your musical priorities. Detail and clarity are real, measurable qualities, and the right pair will reveal recordings you’ve heard a hundred times in a brand new way.